evaluation:extractgrainsizes
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| evaluation:extractgrainsizes [2021/04/20 15:19] – [2. Convert to absolute grain sizes] matthias | evaluation:extractgrainsizes [2021/06/24 10:00] (current) – [2. Convert to absolute grain sizes] matthias | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
| === List of relative grain volumes === | === List of relative grain volumes === | ||
| - | The command line will show a list of relative grain volumes. If you chose the option '' | + | The command line will show a list of relative grain volumes. |
| === Histogram === | === Histogram === | ||
| Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
| Try this: | Try this: | ||
| - | timelessRelToAbsGrainSize.py | + | timelessRelToAbsGrainSize.py |
| + | |||
| + | This command will: | ||
| + | - Read the output file of '' | ||
| + | - Convert the relative grain volumes into absolute grain volumes (in µm) | ||
| + | - Save the absolute grain volumes in a new file '' | ||
| + | - Plot a histogram similar to the one shown above | ||
| + | |||
| + | The explanation of the individual parameters is given in the help: | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | # Explanation of the parameters: | ||
| + | grainsizelist: | ||
| + | -H & -V # beamsize_H and beamsize_V: | ||
| + | -r # rotationrange: | ||
| + | -t # samplethickness: | ||
| + | -i # indexquality: | ||
| + | -rad # radius: | ||
| + | -hist # histogram_bins: | ||
| + | -prop # proportion: | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Estimation of the illuminated volume === | ||
| + | The entire conversion is based on the correct estimation of the volume that is illuminated by the X-rays. Normally, this would be a simple cuboid: | ||
| + | V = a * b * c | ||
| + | where a, b and c are the gasket thickness and the dimensions of the X-ray beam. | ||
| + | |||
| + | However, because the sample is rotated, the actual volume is larger: The actual illuminated volume of a rotated sample chamber is: | ||
| + | V_r = v * [d * h * cos(ω/2) + 0.5 * h^2 * tan(ω/2)] | ||
| + | with | ||
| + | * v = beamsize parallel to the rotation axis (usually vertical) | ||
| + | * d = beamsize orthogonal to the rotation axis (usually horizontal) | ||
| + | * h = gasket thickness | ||
| + | |||
| + | For a graphical explanation, | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | |||
| + | A quick calculation example shows the difference: | ||
| + | v = 2 µm | ||
| + | d = 2 µm | ||
| + | h = 20 µm | ||
| + | ω = 56° | ||
| + | |||
| + | V = 80 µm^3 | ||
| + | V_r = 283 µm^3 | ||
| + | |||
| + | The example shows that the volume, which is illuminated by the X-rays, can increase drastically when the sample is rotated. Therefore, the accurate estimation of the illuminated volume is crucial for the determination of the precise conversion factor. | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Error estimation === | ||
| + | While the dimensions of the X-ray beam and the rotation angle are usually well known, the thickness of the gasket in a diamond-anvil cell experiment is less constrained. This is due to the fact that the initial indentation thickness is getting thinner as the pressure is increased during the experiment. Usually, the rate, at which this happens, is unknown. Measuring the actual gasket thickness after the experiment can help to model the thickness evolution throughout the experiment. This can, however, still only be an approximation of the true thickness. | ||
| - | To be continued ... | ||
evaluation/extractgrainsizes.1618924760.txt.gz · Last modified: by matthias
